Portland Mercury


 
 

« Chocolate Rabbits | Main | The Honeydrips (and Jens Lekman) - Tonight »

Saturday, March 22, 2008

Let's Talk About... Royalties and the Web

Posted by Andrew R Tonry on Sat, Mar 22 at 5:16 PM

What a nice surprise this morning to find an editorial from Billy Bragg gracing the pages of the New York Times—and lord, how brilliant it is. Bragg makes a strong point about social networks profiting off musicians without sharing the wealth. Not much I can add. A great read. An excerpt:

The musicians who posted their work on Bebo.com are no different from investors in a start-up enterprise. Their investment is the content provided for free while the site has no liquid assets. Now that the business has reaped huge benefits, surely they deserve a dividend.

The claim that sites such as MySpace and Bebo are doing us a favor by promoting our work is disingenuous. Radio stations also promote our work, but they pay us a royalty that recognizes our contribution to their business. Why should that not apply to the Internet, too?

The whole thing is solid. Read it.

Also, if you want to know more about the rad work Bragg has done, which essentially forced Myspace to change it’s terms of service that “made it seem as though any content posted on the site, including music, automatically became the site’s property,” check that out here.

Never really taken much notice of Bragg’s music, but hot damn if I don’t love him now…

Comments

now, i'm a musician, and although i'm all about musicians getting paid for their work, it just seems like bragg is spending far too much time complaining about the internet and not doing much to combat the fact that the internet's not making him any money. but come on, ever since the guy has become a headline-grabber for attacking myspace, has the guy put out any work that's actually BEEN FOR SALE? not to my knowledge. and if it has, it's not a piece of work that's worth being bought, because noone's talking about billy bragg's new album.

the whole argument about radio paying royalties is tired, because YOU PRACTICALLY HAVE TO PAY RADIO STATIONS TO GET AIRPLAY. i mean, come on dude, it's 2008; at this point, the internet and file-sharing is never going to go away. my advice to mr. bragg would be to stop being counterproductive and put some stuff out for free on the internet, and THEN put out an album-- A GOOD ALBUM, mind you-- that people would be willing to go out and pay for. in my experience, putting out a shitload of music for free has only increased the demand for a physical, buyable product.

mr. bragg should try this, instead of bitching over spilled milk that's never going to get mopped up.

i think there's a fight to be made over a guy that makes SIX HUNDRED MILLION dollars in large part because of the content that musicians provided him. what if network executives made all the money and the folks that made the tv shows got none?

i understand that there probably should be some kickback, but at the same time, most musicians who post their work on myspace, etc. know what they're getting themselves into. it's a means of free promotion, kinda like a good review in a widely-read publication, you know? if you had to pay a monthly fee for a myspace page, this would be a much larger problem.

if royalties had to be paid out for using myspace or bebo, then the same would have to go for mp3 blogs and the forkcast sidebar on pitchfork. touch one, touch all.

the bebo case is especially gnarly... and speaking of gnarly, it would be extremely difficult to divide the monies between so many bands and still have it make a difference. perhaps a sizable donation towards something like health care funds for aging musicians? i know there are organizations like this in the jazz world...

Blogtown End Hits: The Merc's Music Blog MOD: Merc on Design 2008: Merc Election Coverage Mercury Eat and Drink Guide  

Friends of End Hits

Enemies of End Hits