http://endhits.portlandmercury.com/endhits/archives/2009/09/15/beatles-itunes-etc Comments On: Beatles, iTunes, etc. by Andrew R Tonry en-us Copyright 2013 Portland Mercury. All rights reserved. This RSS file is offered to individuals, Portland Mercury readers, and non-commercial organizations only. Any commercial websites wishing to use this RSS file, please contact Portland Mercury. webmaster@portlandmercury.com (Portland Mercury Webmaster) Sat, 18 May 2013 00:00:01 -0700 Sat, 18 May 2013 14:30:00 -0700 Foundation http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss
Joe Jackson, perhaps?
Posted by jew]]> Tue, 15 Sep 2009 16:50:06 -0700 Portland Mercury
I'd agree, except that Apple/iTunes now has an option for lossless track downloads. I can't remember if they're in 256kbps AAC or FLAC or some other alphabet soup mashup, but you can most definitely get tracks that don't bottom out the high range or top off the z-axis or whatever the fuck audiophiles think they can hear on 192kbps MP3s.

As far as I know The Beatles don't exist on iTunes purely because of legal/licensing issues. Someone is holding out for a bigger paycheck.
Posted by Earnest "Nex" Cavalli]]> Tue, 15 Sep 2009 16:34:35 -0700 Portland Mercury